Assessing the trustworthiness of information online is an increasingly complicated task. Literacy-based paradigms are widely used to help, yet have also been widely critiqued. We conducted a study with 35 Gen Zers from across the U.S. to understand how they assess information online. We found that they tended to encounter--rather than search for--information, and that those encounters were shaped more by social motivations than by truth-seeking queries. For them, information processing is fundamentally a social practice. Gen Zers interpreted online information together, as aspirational members of social groups. Our participants sought information sensibility: a socially-informed awareness of the value of information encountered online. We outline key challenges they faced and practices they used to make sense of information. Our findings suggest that, like Gen Z's information sensibility practices, solutions and strategies to address misinformation should also be embedded in social contexts online
翻译:评估在线信息的可信赖性是一项日益复杂的任务。基于扫盲的范例被广泛用于帮助,但也被广泛批评。我们与来自美国各地的35个泽斯将军进行了一项研究,以了解他们如何在网上评估信息。我们发现,他们往往遇到信息,而不是搜索信息,这些相遇更多地是由社会动机而不是寻求真相的查询所决定的。对他们来说,信息处理基本上是一种社会做法。泽斯将军将在线信息一起解读为社会群体的渴望成员。我们的参与者寻求信息敏感性:了解在线信息的价值的社会知情意识。我们概述了他们所面临的关键挑战以及他们用来理解信息的做法。我们的调查结果表明,像吉恩·泽斯的信息敏感度一样,应对错误信息的做法、解决方案和战略也应嵌入在线社会环境。