Linguistic labels are effective means of expressing qualitative assessments because they account for the uncertain nature of human preferences. However, to perform computations with linguistic labels, they must first be converted to numbers using a scale function. Within the context of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the most popular scale used to represent linguistic labels numerically is the linear 1-9 scale, which was proposed by Saaty. However, this scale has been criticized by several researchers, and various alternatives are proposed in the literature. There is a growing interest in scale individualization rather than relying on a generic fixed scale since the perceptions of the decision maker regarding these linguistic labels are highly subjective. The methods proposed in the literature for scale individualization focus on minimizing the transitivity errors, i.e., consistency. In this research, we proposed a novel, easy-to-learn, easy-to-implement, and computationally less demanding scale individualization approach based on compatibility. We also developed an experimental setup and introduced two new metrics that can be used by researchers that contribute to the theory of AHP. To assess the value of scale individualization in general, and the performance of the proposed novel approach in particular, numerical and two empirical studies are conducted. The results of the analyses demonstrate that the scale individualization outperforms the conventional fixed scale approach and validates the benefit of the proposed novel heuristic.
翻译:语言标签是表达质量评估的有效手段,因为它们反映了人类偏好的不确定性质。然而,为了用语言标签进行计算,它们首先必须转换成使用比例函数的数字。在分析等级进程(AHP)范围内,最流行用来代表语言标签的尺度是Saatty提议的直线1-9尺度。然而,这一尺度受到若干研究人员的批评,文献中提出了各种替代方法。人们越来越关注规模的个性化,而不是依赖通用的固定尺度,因为决策者对这些语言标签的看法是高度主观的。文献中提议的关于规模个体化的方法侧重于尽量减少过渡性错误,即一致性。在这项研究中,我们提出了一个新颖的、容易阅读、容易执行和计算较少的基于兼容性的尺度化方法。我们还开发了一种试验性的设置,并引入了两种新的尺度,研究人员可以用来帮助制定AHP理论的理论。文献中拟议的规模化个体化方法的数值是:在总体规模分析中评估规模化的尺度价值,即一致性。在常规规模分析中,个人规模分析的演化方法的演化表现是两种新的尺度,在常规规模分析中的演化方法中的演进。