Encouraged by decision makers' appetite for future information on topics ranging from elections to pandemics, and enabled by the explosion of data and computational methods, model based forecasts have garnered increasing influence on a breadth of decisions in modern society. Using several classic examples from fisheries management, I demonstrate that selecting the model or models that produce the most accurate and precise forecast (measured by statistical scores) can sometimes lead to worse outcomes (measured by real-world objectives). This can create a forecast trap, in which the outcomes such as fish biomass or economic yield decline while the manager becomes increasingly convinced that these actions are consistent with the best models and data available. The forecast trap is not unique to this example, but a fundamental consequence of non-uniqueness of models. Existing practices promoting a broader set of models are the best way to avoid the trap.
翻译:在决策者对从选举到流行病等主题的未来信息的渴望的鼓舞下,并由于数据和计算方法的爆炸,基于模型的预测对现代社会的广泛决策产生了越来越大的影响。我利用渔业管理的几个典型例子,表明选择能够产生最准确和最准确预测的模型或模型(以统计分数衡量)有时会导致更坏的结果(以现实世界目标衡量),这可能造成一种预测陷阱,其中鱼类生物量或经济产量等结果下降,而管理人员则越来越相信这些行动与现有的最佳模型和数据是一致的。预测陷阱不是这个例子所独有的,而是模型不独特的根本后果。促进一套更广泛的模型的现有做法是避免这一陷阱的最佳办法。