As buildings are central to the social and environmental sustainability of human settlements, high-quality geospatial data are necessary to support their management and planning. Authorities around the world are increasingly collecting and releasing such data openly, but these are mostly disconnected initiatives, making it challenging for users to fully leverage their potential for urban sustainability. We conduct a global study of 2D geospatial data on buildings that are released by governments for free access, ranging from individual cities to whole countries. We identify and benchmark more than 140 releases from 28 countries containing above 100 million buildings, based on five dimensions: accessibility, richness, data quality, harmonisation, and relationships with other actors. We find that much building data released by governments is valuable for spatial analyses, but there are large disparities among them and not all instances are of high quality, harmonised, and rich in descriptive information. Our study also compares authoritative data to OpenStreetMap, a crowdsourced counterpart, suggesting a mutually beneficial and complementary relationship.
翻译:由于建筑是人类住区社会和环境可持续性的核心,高质量的地理空间数据是支持其管理和规划所必需的。世界各地的当局正在越来越多地公开收集和发布这些数据,但大多是互不相干的举措,使用户难以充分发挥城市可持续性的潜力。我们对全球2D地理空间数据进行了研究,这些数据涉及政府为自由进入而释放的建筑物,从各个城市到整个国家,从各个城市到所有国家。我们根据五个层面,即无障碍、丰富、数据质量、协调以及与其他行为者的关系,确定并衡量来自28个国家超过1亿座建筑物的140多处释放量。我们发现,政府发布的许多建筑数据对于空间分析是有价值的,但它们之间存在巨大的差异,并非所有实例都具有高质量、协调性和丰富的描述性信息。我们的研究还把权威数据与来自众多城市的对应方OpenStreetMap(OpenStreetMap)进行比较,表明一种互利和互补的关系。