QUIC was recently standardized as RFC 9000, but the performance of QUIC over geostationary satellite links is problematic due to the non-applicability of Performance Enhancing Proxies. As of today, there are more than a dozen of different QUIC implementations. So far performance evaluations of QUIC over satellite links were limited to specific QUIC implementations. By deploying a modified version of the IETF QUIC-Interop-Runner, this paper evaluates the performance of multiple QUIC implementations over multiple geostationary satellite links. This includes two emulated ones (with and without packet loss) and two real ones. The results show that the goodput achieved with QUIC over geostationary satellite links is very poor in general, and especially poor when there is packet loss. Some implementations fail completely and the performance of the other implementations varies greatly. The performance depends on both client and server implementation.
翻译：QIIC最近被标准化为RFC 9000,但QIIC对地球静止卫星连接的性能有问题,因为不能适用增强性能的近地点。截至今天,已有十多个不同的QIIC实施程序。到目前为止,对QIIC对卫星连接的性能评估仅限于具体实施QIIC。通过部署经修改的IETF QUIC-Interop-Runner,本文件评估了在多个地球静止卫星链接上多次执行QIIC的性能,其中包括两个效仿的(有包和没有包损失的)和两个真实的。结果显示,在QIIC对地球静止卫星连接取得的优绩一般很差,在出现包损失时尤其差。有些执行失败,其他执行的性能差异很大。业绩取决于客户和服务器的性能。
相关内容
微信扫码咨询专知VIP会员