This paper reports on the second "Throughput" phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first "Accuracy" phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC): given O($10^5$) points, the participants had to connect them into O($10^4$) individual groups that represent the particle trajectories which are approximated helical. While in the first phase only the accuracy mattered, the goal of this second phase was a compromise between the accuracy and the speed of inference. Both were measured on the Codalab platform where the participants had to upload their software. The best three participants had solutions with good accuracy and speed an order of magnitude faster than the state of the art when the challenge was designed. Although the core algorithms were less diverse than in the first phase, a diversity of techniques have been used and are described in this paper. The performance of the algorithms are analysed in depth and lessons derived.
翻译:本文报告了Codalab平台跟踪机器学习(TrackML)第二个“吞吐”阶段的“跟踪机器学习(TrackML)”挑战。与第一个“准确性”阶段一样,参与者不得不解决一个与精确跟踪粒子轨迹有关的困难实验问题,例如,在大型 Hadron相撞器(LHC)上产生的粒子轨迹:鉴于O(10美元5美元)点,参与者不得不将其与代表粒子轨迹的O(10美元4美元)个别组连接起来,这些粒子轨迹大致是 helicalal的。在第一阶段,仅涉及准确性,而第二阶段的目标是精确性和推断速度之间的折中。两者都是在参与者不得不上传软件的 Codalab 平台上测量的。最优秀的三名参与者的解决方案精度和速度都快于设计挑战时的艺术状态。尽管核心算法与第一阶段相比没有那么多,但使用和描述的技术的多样性。本文对算法的绩效进行了深度分析并得出了经验教训。