Principled Bayesian deep learning (BDL) does not live up to its potential when we only focus on marginal predictive distributions (marginal predictives). Recent works have highlighted the importance of joint predictives for (Bayesian) sequential decision making from a theoretical and synthetic perspective. We provide additional practical arguments grounded in real-world applications for focusing on joint predictives: we discuss online Bayesian inference, which would allow us to make predictions while taking into account additional data without retraining, and we propose new challenging evaluation settings using active learning and active sampling. These settings are motivated by an examination of marginal and joint predictives, their respective cross-entropies, and their place in offline and online learning. They are more realistic than previously suggested ones, building on work by Wen et al. (2021) and Osband et al. (2022), and focus on evaluating the performance of approximate BNNs in an online supervised setting. Initial experiments, however, raise questions on the feasibility of these ideas in high-dimensional parameter spaces with current BDL inference techniques, and we suggest experiments that might help shed further light on the practicality of current research for these problems. Importantly, our work highlights previously unidentified gaps in current research and the need for better approximate joint predictives.
翻译:我们从理论和合成角度出发,强调联合预测(巴伊西亚)相继决策的重要性。我们以现实世界应用为基础,为联合预测提供了更多切实可行的论据:我们在线讨论巴伊西亚人的推论,这将使我们能够在不进行再培训的情况下进行预测,我们提出新的挑战性评价环境,利用积极的学习和积极抽样,研究边际和联合预测分布、各自的跨热带以及它们在离线和在线学习中的位置,从而激发了联合预测对于(巴伊西亚)从理论和合成角度进行连续决策的重要性。我们以现实世界应用为基础,为联合预测重点提供了更多的实际论据:我们讨论网上巴伊西亚人的推论,这将使我们能够在不进行再培训的情况下作出预测,我们提出新的挑战性评价环境。然而,初步实验提出这些想法在使用当前BDL推理技术的高维度参数空间的可行性问题。我们建议进行一些实验,这些实验也许有助于进一步消除目前各种实际研究的未知性差距。