Survey-based studies suggest that search engines are trusted more than social media or even traditional news, although cases of false information or defamation are known. In this study, we analyze query suggestion features of three search engines to see if these features introduce some bias into the query and search process that might compromise this trust. We test our approach on person-related search suggestions by querying the names of politicians from the German Bundestag before the German federal election of 2017. This study introduces a framework to systematically examine and automatically analyze the varieties in different query suggestions for person names offered by major search engines. To test our framework, we collected data from the Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo query suggestion APIs over a period of four months for 629 different names of German politicians. The suggestions were clustered and statistically analyzed with regards to different biases, like gender, party, or age and with regards to the stability of the suggestions over time.
翻译:基于调查的研究表明,搜索引擎比社交媒体甚至传统新闻更值得信任,尽管虚假信息或诽谤案件是已知的。在本研究中,我们分析三个搜索引擎的查询建议特征,看这些特征是否会在查询和搜索过程中造成某些偏差,从而损害这一信任。我们在2017年德国联邦选举之前,通过查询德国联邦议院的政治家姓名,检验我们关于与人有关的搜索建议的方法。本研究引入了一个框架,系统检查并自动分析主要搜索引擎提供的个人姓名不同查询建议中的品种。为了测试我们的框架,我们收集了来自谷歌、Bing和DuckDuckDuckGGo查询建议API 的数据,为期四个月,共收集了629个德国政治家不同姓名的数据,对这些建议进行了分组和统计分析,涉及性别、政党或年龄等不同偏见以及长期建议稳定性。