In this paper, we propose considering an exact likelihood score (ELS) test for non-inferiority comparison and we derive its test-based confidence interval for the difference between two independent binomial proportions. The p-value for this test is obtained by using exact binomial probabilities with the nuisance parameter being replaced by its restricted maximum likelihood estimate. Calculated type I errors revealed that the proposed ELS method has important advantages for non-inferiority comparisons over popular asymptotic methods for adequately powered confirmatory clinical trials, at 80% or 90% statistical power. For unbalanced sample sizes of the compared treatment groups, the type I errors for the asymptotic score method were shown to be higher than the nominal level in a systematic pattern over a range of the true proportions, but the ELS method did not suffer from such a problem. On average, the true type I error of the ELS method was closer to the nominal level than all considered methods in the empirical comparisons. Also, in rare cases, the type I errors of the ELS test exceeded the nominal level, but only by a small amount. In addition, the p-value and confidence interval using the ELS method can be obtained in less than 30 seconds of computer time for most confirmatory trials. The theoretical arguments and the attractive empirical evidence, along with fast computation time, should make the ELS method very attractive for consideration in statistical practice.
翻译:在本文中,我们建议考虑对非急性性比较进行精确的概率评分(ELS)测试,我们从中推算出对两个独立的二进制比例差异的测试基础信任间隔。该测试的p值是通过使用精确的二进制概率概率来获得的,而其破坏性参数被其限制的最大概率估计所取代。计算型I错误表明,拟议的ELS方法在非急性性比较方面比为充分授权的诊断性临床试验采用流行的无源性方法有很大的优势,即80%或90%的统计能力。对于比较治疗组的抽样大小不平衡,在系统模式上,对无症状评分方法的I型错误显示高于名义值值值值,超过真实比例范围的范围,但ELS方法没有受到这种问题的影响。平均而言,ELS方法的真正类型误差比实验性比较中考虑的所有方法都更接近于名义水平。此外,在极少数情况下,ELS测试的I型误差超过了名义值水平,但只有少量时间段。此外,在模型推算中,采用最有吸引力的概率的推算方法,在最短的时间间隔内可以确认。