We present argumentation schemes to model reasoning with legal cases. We provide schemes for each of the three stages that take place after the facts are established: factor ascription, issue resolution and outcome determination. The schemes are illustrated with examples from a specific legal domain, US Trade Secrets law, and the wider applicability of these schemes is discussed.
翻译:我们提出法律案例推理模式的论证计划,我们为事实确定后发生的三个阶段中的每一个阶段提供计划:要素描述、问题解决和结果确定,用具体法律领域的例子,即美国贸易秘密法来说明这些计划,并讨论这些计划的更广泛适用性。