We present a general framework for designing approximately revenue-optimal mechanisms for multi-item additive auctions, which applies to both truthful and non-truthful auctions. Given a (not necessarily truthful) single-item auction format $A$ satisfying certain technical conditions, we run simultaneous item auctions augmented with a personalized entry fee for each bidder that must be paid before the auction can be accessed. These entry fees depend only on the prior distribution of bidder types, and in particular are independent of realized bids. We bound the revenue of the resulting two-part tariff mechanism using a novel geometric technique that enables revenue guarantees for many common non-truthful auctions that previously had none. Our approach adapts and extends the duality framework of Cai et al [CDW16] beyond truthful auctions. Our framework can be used with many common auction formats, such as simultaneous first-price, simultaneous second-price, and simultaneous all-pay auctions. Our results for first price and all-pay are the first revenue guarantees of non-truthful mechanisms in multi-dimensional environments, addressing an open question in the literature [RST17]. If all-pay auctions are used, we prove that the resulting mechanism is also credible in the sense that the auctioneer cannot benefit by deviating from the stated mechanism after observing agent bids. This is the first static credible mechanism for multi-item additive auctions that achieves a constant factor of the optimal revenue. If second-price auctions are used, we obtain a truthful $O(1)$-approximate mechanism with fixed entry fees that are amenable to tuning via online learning techniques.
翻译:我们提出了一个总体框架,用于设计大约收入最佳的多项目添加拍卖机制,这种机制适用于真实和非真实的拍卖。鉴于一个(不一定是真实的)单一项目拍卖格式,符合某些技术条件(A$$美元),我们同时进行项目拍卖,并增加每个投标人的个人化进入费,在拍卖进入之前必须支付这笔费用。这些进入费仅取决于投标人类型的事先分配,特别是独立于已实现的投标。我们使用一种新颖的几何技术将由此产生的双部分关税机制的收入约束在多维环境中,使许多共同的非真实拍卖能够带来收入保障,而以前没有这种保证。我们的方法调整并扩展了Cai et al [CDW16] 的双重性框架,超越了真实拍卖的某些技术条件。我们的框架可以用许多共同的拍卖格式使用,例如同时的第一价格、同时的第二价格和同时的全价拍卖。我们的第一价格和全价是多维环境下的非真实性机制的第一个收入保障,在文献[RST17]中解决了一个公开的不真实性拍卖问题。如果所有对定期拍卖机制的收益机制使用不可信,那么,那么,我们就使用一个稳定的拍卖机制的收益机制就证明,在持续拍卖机制之后,我们就能够进行。