The development of approaches for trajectory prediction requires metrics to validate and compare their performance. Currently established metrics are based on Euclidean distance, which means that errors are weighted equally in all directions. Euclidean metrics are insufficient for structured environments like roads, since they do not properly capture the agent's intent relative to the underlying lane. In order to provide a reasonable assessment of trajectory prediction approaches with regard to the downstream planning task, we propose a new metric that is lane distance-based: Lane Miss Rate (LMR). For the calculation of LMR, the ground-truth and predicted endpoints are assigned to lane segments, more precisely their centerlines. Measured by the distance along the lane segments, predictions that are within a certain threshold distance to the ground-truth count as hits, otherwise they count as misses. LMR is then defined as the ratio of sequences that yield a miss. Our results on three state-of-the-art trajectory prediction models show that LMR preserves the order of Euclidean distance-based metrics. In contrast to the Euclidean Miss Rate, qualitative results show that LMR yields misses for sequences where predictions are located on wrong lanes. Hits on the other hand result for sequences where predictions are located on the correct lane. This means that LMR implicitly weights Euclidean error relative to the lane and goes into the direction of capturing intents of traffic agents. The source code of LMR for Argoverse 1 is publicly available.
翻译:轨迹预测方法的开发需要评估指标以验证和比较它们的性能。目前已经建立的评估指标都是基于欧氏距离,这意味着所有方向的误差被等权重处理,而欧氏距离对于像道路这样的有结构的环境来说是不足够的,因为它们无法正确地捕捉智能体相对于基础车道的意图。为了合理评估轨迹预测方法相对于下游规划任务的性能,我们提出了一种新的基于车道距离的评估指标:车道错过率(LMR)。对于LMR的计算,将地面真实轨迹和预测轨迹端点分配到车道线中心线所在的车道段。根据车道段上的距离进行测量,如果预测与真实结果的距离在一定的阈值内,计为"命中",否则计为"错过"。LMR由产生"错过"的序列的比率定义。我们在三个最先进的轨迹预测模型上的实验结果表明,LMR保留了欧氏距离指标的顺序。相对于欧氏错过率,定性结果表明,LMR在轨迹预测被定位在错误车道的序列上产生了"错过",而在定位在正确车道的序列上产生了"命中"。这意味着LMR相对于车道趋势隐含地权重欧氏距离误差,并向正确捕捉交通智能体意图的方向发展。 LM在Argoverse 1中的源代码是公开可用的。