Large Bayesian vector autoregressions with various forms of stochastic volatility have become increasingly popular in empirical macroeconomics. One main difficulty for practitioners is to choose the most suitable stochastic volatility specification for their particular application. We develop Bayesian model comparison methods -- based on marginal likelihood estimators that combine conditional Monte Carlo and adaptive importance sampling -- to choose among a variety of stochastic volatility specifications. The proposed methods can also be used to select an appropriate shrinkage prior on the VAR coefficients, which is a critical component for avoiding over-fitting in high-dimensional settings. Using US quarterly data of different dimensions, we find that both the Cholesky stochastic volatility and factor stochastic volatility outperform the common stochastic volatility specification. Their superior performance, however, can mostly be attributed to the more flexible priors that accommodate cross-variable shrinkage.
翻译:在实证宏观经济中,具有各种形式随机波动的大型贝叶斯矢量自动递减越来越普遍。实践者的一个主要困难是选择最适合其特定应用的随机挥发性规格。我们开发了贝叶斯模式比较方法 -- -- 以有条件的蒙特卡洛和适应重要性抽样相结合的边际概率估测器为基础 -- -- 以在各种随机挥发性规格中作出选择。提议的方法还可以用于在VAR系数之前选择适当的缩放,VAR系数是避免高维环境过分适应的关键组成部分。我们利用美国不同层面的季度数据发现,Cholesky随机挥发性以及因子随机挥发性都超越了常见的随机挥发性规格。但是,其优异性表现主要可归因于适应交叉变变缩的更灵活的前程。