Decision-making systems increasingly orchestrate our world: how to intervene on the algorithmic components to build fair and equitable systems is therefore a question of utmost importance; one that is substantially complicated by the context-dependent nature of fairness and discrimination. Modern decision-making systems that involve allocating resources or information to people (e.g., school choice, advertising) incorporate machine-learned predictions in their pipelines, raising concerns about potential strategic behavior or constrained allocation, concerns usually tackled in the context of mechanism design. Although both machine learning and mechanism design have developed frameworks for addressing issues of fairness and equity, in some complex decision-making systems, neither framework is individually sufficient. In this paper, we develop the position that building fair decision-making systems requires overcoming these limitations which, we argue, are inherent to each field. Our ultimate objective is to build an encompassing framework that cohesively bridges the individual frameworks of mechanism design and machine learning. We begin to lay the ground work towards this goal by comparing the perspective each discipline takes on fair decision-making, teasing out the lessons each field has taught and can teach the other, and highlighting application domains that require a strong collaboration between these disciplines.
翻译:决策系统日益协调我们的世界:因此,如何干预算法组成部分以建立公正和公平制度是一个极为重要的问题;这个问题由于公平和歧视的依环境性质而变得相当复杂;现代决策系统涉及将资源或信息分配给人民(例如学校选择、广告),在管道中包含机学预测,引起对潜在战略行为或有限分配的关切,通常是在机制设计背景下处理的关切问题;虽然机器学习和机制设计都制定了框架,以解决公平与公平问题,在某些复杂的决策系统中,这两个框架都是不够的;在本文件中,我们形成了这样一种立场,即建立公平的决策系统需要克服这些限制,我们认为这些限制是每个领域固有的;我们的最终目标是建立一个将机制设计和机器学习的个别框架紧密地连接起来的综合框架;我们开始通过比较每一学科对公平决策的看法,从每个领域汲取教益和能够教益的教训,来为实现这一目标奠定基础,并强调需要这些学科之间密切合作的应用领域。