The photoelectric factor (PEF) is an important well logging tool to distinguish between different types of reservoir rocks because PEF measurement is sensitive to elements with high atomic number. Furthermore, the ratio of rock minerals could be determined by combining PEF log with other well logs. However, PEF log could be missing in some cases such as in old well logs and wells drilled with barite-based mud. Therefore, developing models for estimating missing PEF log is essential in those circumstances. In this work, we developed various machine learning models to predict PEF values using the following well logs as inputs: bulk density (RHOB), neutron porosity (NPHI), gamma ray (GR), compressional and shear velocity. The predictions of PEF values using adaptive-network-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and artificial neural network (ANN) models have errors of about 16% and 14% average absolute percentage error (AAPE) in the testing dataset, respectively. Thus, a different approach was proposed that is based on the concept of automated machine learning. It works by automatically searching for the optimal model type and optimizes its hyperparameters for the dataset under investigation. This approach selected a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model for accurate estimation of PEF values. The developed GPR model decreases the AAPE of the predicted PEF values in the testing dataset to about 10% AAPE. This error could be further decreased to about 2% by modeling the potential noise in the measurements using the GPR model.
翻译:光电系数(PEF)是一个重要的良好记录工具,用于区分不同类型储油层岩石,因为PEF的测量对原子数高的要素十分敏感。此外,岩矿矿矿的比重可以通过将PEF日志与其他井日志相结合来确定。然而,在某些情况下,例如用巴土泥钻的旧井日志和井井中,PEF日志可能缺失。因此,在这种情况下,为估计缺失的PEF日志制定模型至关重要。在这项工作中,我们开发了各种机器学习模型,以预测PEF值,使用以下井日志作为投入:散装密度(RHOB)、中子渗透度(NPHI)、伽马射线(GR)、压缩和剪切速度(GRR)、压缩和剪切速度(PEF)等。在测试数据集中,通过自动搜索GFA型号模型的精确度值来降低PEFA的数值。在测试中,通过测试A型号模型中,可以进一步提出不同的方法,在自动学习机器的模型概念概念上,通过SARPEFA的精确度模型来降低。