How can researchers from the creative ML/AI community and sociology of culture engage in fruitful collaboration? How do researchers from both fields think (differently) about creativity and the production of creative work? While the ML community considers creativity as a matter of technical expertise and acumen, social scientists have emphasized the role of embeddedness in cultural production. This perspective aims to bridge both disciplines and proposes a conceptual and methodological toolkit for collaboration. We provide a systematic review of recent research in both fields and offer three perspectives around which to structure interdisciplinary research on cultural production: people, processes, and products. We thereby provide necessary grounding work to support multidisciplinary researchers to navigate conceptual and methodological hurdles in their collaboration. Our research will be of interest to ML researchers and sociologists interested in creativity that aim to conduct innovative research by bridging both fields.
翻译:来自创造性的ML/AI社区和文化社会学的研究人员如何进行富有成果的合作?来自这两个领域的研究人员如何(不同地)思考创造性和创造性工作的制作?虽然ML社区将创造力视为技术专长和全能问题,但社会科学家强调文化生产内在性的作用。这一视角旨在将这两个学科联系起来,并提出一个概念和方法上的合作工具。我们系统地审查这两个领域最近的研究,并提供三个观点,用以构建关于文化生产跨学科研究的结构:人、过程和产品。我们因此提供必要的基础工作,支持多学科研究人员在合作中找出概念和方法上的障碍。我们的研究将吸引对创造性感兴趣的ML研究人员和社会学家的兴趣,他们的目的是通过连接这两个领域进行创新研究。