Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) is very popular in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) applications as it provides a decentralized governance solution through blockchain. We analyze the governance characteristics in the Maker protocol, its stablecoin DAI and governance token Maker (MKR). To achieve that, we establish several measurements of centralized governance. Our empirical analysis investigates the effect of centralized governance over a series of factors related to MKR and DAI, such as financial, transaction, network and twitter sentiment indicators. Our results show that governance centralization influences both the Maker protocol, and the distribution of voting power matters. The main implication of this study is that centralized governance in MakerDAO very much exists, while DeFi investors face a trade-off between decentralization and performance of a DeFi protocol. This further contributes to the contemporary debate on whether DeFi can be truly decentralized. centralized governance in MakerDAO very much exists, while DeFi investors face a trade-off between efficiency and decentralization. This further contributes to the contemporary debate on whether DeFi can be truly decentralized.
翻译:去中心化自治组织(DAO)在区块链中提供了分散化治理方案,因此在分散化金融(DeFi)应用中得到了广泛应用。我们分析Maker协议、其稳定币DAI和治理代币Maker(MKR)的治理特征。为了达到这个目的,我们通过建立几种中心化治理测量标准,进行了实证分析,研究了中心化治理对与MKR和DAI相关的多个因素的影响,如金融指标、交易指标、网络指标和Twitter情感指标。结果表明,中心化治理对Maker协议和投票权分配产生影响。本研究的主要含义是,在MakerDAO中,中心化治理实际存在,而DeFi投资者面临着分散化和DeFi协议性能之间的权衡。这进一步有助于当前围绕DeFi能否真正分散化的争议。