In the classical model of computation, it is well established that one-way functions (OWF) are essential for almost every computational cryptographic application. In the quantum setting, however, OWFs appear not to be essential (Kretschmer 2021; Ananth et al., Morimae and Yamakawa 2022), and the question of whether a minimal primitive exists remains open. We consider EFI pairs -- efficiently samplable, statistically far but computationally indistinguishable pairs of distributions. Building on the work of Yan (2022) which shows equivalence between EFI pairs and statistical commitment schemes, we show that EFI pairs are necessary and sufficient for a large class of quantum-cryptographic applications. Specifically, while it was known how to construct commitments schemes, oblivious transfer, and general secure multiparty computation from any EFI, we show how to construct EFI pairs from minimalistic versions of each one of these primitives. We also construct from EFI quantum computational zero knowledge ($\mathsf{QCZK}$) proofs for all of $\mathsf{QIP}$, and construct EFI pairs from essentially any non-trivial $\mathsf{QCZK}$. This suggests that, for much of quantum cryptography, EFI pairs play a similar role to that played by OWFs in the classical setting: they are simple to describe, essential, and also serve as a linchpin for demonstrating equivalence between primitives.
翻译:在古典计算模型中,公认的是单向函数(OWF)对于几乎所有计算加密应用都是必不可少的。然而,在量子设置中,OWFs似乎并不必要(Kretschmer 2021;Anantth等人、Morimae和Yamakawa 2022),而且最小原始元素是否存在的问题仍然开放。我们认为,EFI配对 -- -- 效率可观、统计上远,但计算上无法区分的分配配对。在显示EFI对和统计承诺计划等值的Yan (2022)工作的基础上,我们表明EFFI对大量量测算应用(Kretschmer 2021;Anantth等人等人、Morimathe等人和Yamkakawa 2022)似乎并不必要。具体地说,尽管知道如何从任何EFIFI建立承诺计划、模糊的转移和一般安全的多量计算方法。我们还从EFIFI 简单计算零度知识($mathcs fancial supal) 和OIFismas realicial_Erus ficial_IFIFIFI.