In this paper, we consider the extent of the biases that may arise when an unmeasured confounder is omitted from a structural equation model (SEM) and we propose sensitivity analysis techniques to correct for such biases. We give an analysis of which effects in an SEM are, and are not, biased by an unmeasured confounder. It is shown that a single unmeasured confounder will bias not just one, but numerous, effects in an SEM. We present sensitivity analysis techniques to correct for biases in total, direct, and indirect effects when using SEM analyses, and illustrate these techniques with a study of aging and cognitive function.
翻译:在本文中,我们考虑了在结构等式(SEM)中省略未计量的混乱者时可能出现的偏见程度,我们建议采用敏感性分析技术纠正这种偏见。我们分析了在SEM中哪些影响是、哪些影响不是由未计量的混乱者所偏向的。我们发现,一个单一的未计量的混乱者不仅会偏向于SEM中的一种影响,而且会偏向许多影响。我们提出敏感性分析技术,以便在使用SEM分析时纠正整体、直接和间接影响的偏见,并用老龄化和认知功能研究来说明这些技术。