What science does, what science could do, and how to make science work? If we want to know the answers to these questions, we need to be able to uncover the structures and mechanisms of science, in addition to the metrics that are easily collectable and quantifiable. In this review article, we link metrics to mechanisms, by demonstrating how emerging metrics not only offer complementaries to the existing metrics, but also shed light on the underlying social organization and function of science. Based on fundamental properties of science emerging across the units of analysis, we classify existing theories and findings into, hot and cold science referring to attention to scientific fields, fast and slow science reflecting productivity of scientists and teams, soft and hard science revealing reproducibility of research papers. We suggest that curiosity about social mechanisms of science since Derek J. de Solla Price, Eugene Garfield, Robert K. Merton, and many others complement the zeitgeist in pursuing new, complex metrics without understanding the underlying processes.
翻译:科学可以做什么,科学可以做什么,科学可以做什么,如何使科学发挥作用?如果我们想知道这些问题的答案,我们需要能够发现科学的结构和机制,除了易于收集、可量化的计量之外,还需要发现科学的结构和机制。在本评论文章中,我们将衡量尺度与机制联系起来,展示新兴指标不仅如何为现有计量尺度提供补充,而且如何揭示科学的基本社会组织和功能。根据分析单位中新出现的科学的基本特性,我们将现有的理论和发现分为:热和冷却的科学,以科学领域为重点,快速和缓慢的科学反映科学家和团队的生产力,软和硬科学揭示研究论文的再生能力。我们建议,自德里克·索拉普赖普尔、尤金·加菲尔德、罗伯特·梅尔顿和许多其他方面以来,我们对科学社会机制的好奇感,是对热和冷的科学,以科学领域为重点,反映科学家和团队生产力的快速和缓慢科学,以及软和硬科学揭示了研究论文的再生能力。我们建议,自德里克·杰·索拉普莱斯、尤金·加菲尔德、罗伯特·梅尔顿和许多其他方面,我们对热治学家在不理解基础过程的情况下追求新的、复杂的计量方法进行补充。