Recent work has focused on the potential and pitfalls of causal identification in observational studies with multiple simultaneous treatments. On the one hand, a latent variable model fit to the observed treatments can identify essential aspects of the distribution of unobserved confounders. On the other hand, it has been shown that even when the latent confounder distribution is known exactly, causal effects are still not point identifiable. Thus, the practical benefits of latent variable modeling in multi-treatment settings remain unclear. We clarify these issues with a sensitivity analysis method that can be used to characterize the range of causal effects that are compatible with the observed data. Our method is based on a copula factorization of the joint distribution of outcomes, treatments, and confounders, and can be layered on top of arbitrary observed data models. We propose a practical implementation of this approach making use of the Gaussian copula, and establish conditions under which causal effects can be bounded. We also describe approaches for reasoning about effects, including calibrating sensitivity parameters, quantifying robustness of effect estimates, and selecting models which are most consistent with prior hypotheses.
翻译:一方面,与所观察的治疗方法相适应的潜在变量模型可以确定未观察到的混淆分子分布的基本方面;另一方面,已经表明,即使潜在混淆分子分布完全已知,但仍无法确定因果关系。因此,在多种处理环境中潜在变量建模的实际好处仍然不明确。我们用敏感度分析方法澄清这些问题,该方法可用来确定与所观察到的数据相容的因果关系范围。我们的方法基于结果、治疗和纠结者联合分布的混合因子化,可以在任意观察到的数据模型的顶部进行分层。我们建议实际实施这一方法,利用高斯断层,并确定因果关系的界限条件。我们还描述了对效果进行推理的方法,包括校准敏感度参数,量化效果估计的稳健性,以及选择最符合先前假设的模型。