Inspired by the recent COVID-19 pandemic, we study a generalization of the multi-resource allocation problem with heterogeneous demands and Leontief utilities. Unlike existing settings, we allow each agent to specify requirements to only accept allocations from a subset of the total supply for each resource. These requirements can take form in location constraints (e.g. A hospital can only accept volunteers who live nearby due to commute limitations). This can also model a type of substitution effect where some agents need 1 unit of resource A \emph{or} B, both belonging to the same meta-type. But some agents specifically want A, and others specifically want B. We propose a new mechanism called Dominant Resource Fairness with Meta Types which determines the allocations by solving a small number of linear programs. The proposed method satisfies Pareto optimality, envy-freeness, strategy-proofness, and a notion of sharing incentive for our setting. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to study this problem formulation, which improved upon existing work by capturing more constraints that often arise in real life situations. Finally, we show numerically that our method scales better to large problems than alternative approaches.
翻译:受最近的COVID-19大流行的启发,我们研究了多种资源分配问题与不同要求和Leontief公用事业的概括性。与现有的环境不同,我们允许每个代理商具体规定要求只接受每项资源总供应的一小部分分配;这些要求的形式可以是地点限制(例如医院只能接受因通勤限制而住在附近的志愿者);这也可以模拟一种替代效应,即某些代理商需要属于同一元型的A\emph{or}B资源单位。但有些代理商特别需要A,而另一些则特别需要B。我们提议了一种新机制,即 " 代用型资源支配性公平 ",通过解决少量线性方案确定分配。提议的方法满足了Pareto最佳性、无嫉妒性、战略防护性和分享激励我们环境的概念。我们最了解的情况是,我们首先研究这一问题的提法,通过抓住现实生活状况中经常出现的更多限制而改进了现有的工作。最后,我们从数字上表明,我们的方法规模比替代方法更适合大的问题。