Members of editorial boards play the role of gatekeepers of science because. This paper analyses the national distribution of editorial boards members of economics journal, their affiliation, and their gender. It studies also the interlocking editorship network generated by the presence of a same person on the editorial board of more than one journal. The analysis is based on a unique database comprising all the 1,516 journals indexed in the database EconLit with an active editorial board in 2019. For each journal, we manually collected the names of the board members along with their affiliation, obtaining a database containing more than 44,000 members from more than 6,000 institutions and 142 countries. These data allow to investigate the phenomenon of gatekeeping in contemporary economics on an unprecedented large scale. The obtained results highlight some common issues concerning the editorial gatekeeping, leading to the conclusion that in Economics the academic publishing environment is governed by an \'elite composed mainly of men affiliated with United States \'elite universities. Homophily in terms of geographic, institutional and gender distribution is higher in the most prestigious journal and among Editors-in-Chief. Finally, it appears that `strategic decisions' in the selection of board members reproduce this homophily.
翻译:委员会成员是科学门户的守门人,因此本文分析了经济学期刊的编辑委员会成员的国别分布、所属机构和性别。该研究还探讨了同一人员在多个期刊编辑委员会上的交错编辑网络。分析基于一个独特的数据库,其中包含2019年EconLit数据库中所有1,516种具有活跃编辑委员会的期刊。对于每个期刊,我们手动收集了委员会成员的姓名和所属机构,得到了一个包含来自6,000多个机构和142个国家的超过44,000名成员的数据库。这些数据允许在前所未有的大规模上研究当代经济学中的守门人现象。获得的结果突显出编辑守门人的常见问题,得出的结论是,在经济学中,学术出版环境由主要是美国精英大学的男性“精英”统治。在地理、机构和性别分布方面的同一性在最负盛名的期刊和主编中更高。最后,似乎“战略决策”在选择委员会成员时会复制这种同一性。