The development of approaches for trajectory prediction requires metrics to validate and compare their performance. Currently established metrics are based on Euclidean distance, which means that errors are weighted equally in all directions. Euclidean metrics are insufficient for structured environments like roads, since they do not properly capture the agent's intent relative to the underlying lane. In order to provide a reasonable assessment of trajectory prediction approaches with regard to the downstream planning task, we propose a new metric that is lane distance-based: Lane Miss Rate (LMR). For the calculation of LMR, the ground-truth and predicted endpoints are assigned to lane segments, more precisely their centerlines. Measured by the distance along the lane segments, predictions that are within a certain threshold distance to the ground-truth count as hits, otherwise they count as misses. LMR is then defined as the ratio of sequences that yield a miss. Our results on three state-of-the-art trajectory prediction models show that LMR preserves the order of Euclidean distance-based metrics. In contrast to the Euclidean Miss Rate, qualitative results show that LMR yields misses for sequences where predictions are located on wrong lanes. Hits on the other hand result for sequences where predictions are located on the correct lane. This means that LMR implicitly weights Euclidean error relative to the lane and goes into the direction of capturing intents of traffic agents. The source code of LMR for Argoverse 2 is publicly available.
翻译:轨迹预测方法的开发需要度量标准来验证和比较它们的性能。目前已建立的度量标准基于欧几里得距离,这意味着在所有方向上都赋予相同的权重。欧几里得度量对于像道路这样结构化的环境是不足够的,因为它们不能很好地捕捉到代理人相对于底层车道的意图。为了提供对下游规划任务的轨迹预测方法的合理评估,我们提出了一种基于车道距离的新度量标准:车道误差率(LMR)。为了计算LMR,将地面真实点和预测点分配到车道段上,更确切地说是它们的中心线。通过沿着车道段测量距离,预测距离地面真实点在一定阈值距离内的被视为命中,否则被视为漏检。LMR定义为序列产生漏检的比率。我们对三种最先进的轨迹预测模型的结果表明,LMR保留了欧几里得距离度量的顺序。与欧几里得漏检率相反,定性结果显示LMR会针对预测的错误车道产生漏检。另一方面,正确车道上的预测则被视为命中。这意味着LMR相对于车道隐式地对欧几里得误差赋予了权重,并朝着捕捉交通代理人意图的方向。针对Argoverse 2的LMR源代码已经公开。