Causal thinking and decision making under uncertainty are fundamental aspects of intelligent reasoning. Decision making under uncertainty has been well studied when information is considered at the associative (probabilistic) level. The classical Theorems of von Neumann-Morgenstern and Savage provide a formal criterion for rational choice using purely associative information. Causal inference often yields uncertainty about the exact causal structure, so we consider what kinds of decisions are possible in those conditions. In this work, we consider decision problems in which available actions and consequences are causally connected. After recalling a previous causal decision making result, which relies on a known causal model, we consider the case in which the causal mechanism that controls some environment is unknown to a rational decision maker. In this setting we state and prove a causal version of Savage's Theorem, which we then use to develop a notion of causal games with its respective causal Nash equilibrium. These results highlight the importance of causal models in decision making and the variety of potential applications.
翻译:不确定情况下的因果思维和决策是明智推理的根本方面。 当信息在关联(概率)层面得到考虑时,对不确定情况下的决策进行了仔细研究。冯纽曼-摩根森特尔和萨瓦奇的古典理论为使用纯关联信息进行理性选择提供了正式标准。 逻辑推论往往产生对确切因果结构的不确定性, 所以我们考虑在这些条件下可以做出什么样的决定。 在这项工作中, 我们考虑现有行动和后果有因果关联的决策问题。 在回顾以前基于已知因果模式的因果决策结果后, 我们考虑了合理决策者不知道控制某些环境的因果机制的案例。 在此情况下,我们说明并证明Savage的理论的因果版本, 我们随后用它来发展一个因果游戏的概念, 其因果平衡。 这些结果凸显了因果模型在决策中的重要性以及潜在应用的多样性。