This study aimed to provide a framework to evaluate team attacking performances in rugby league using 59,233 plays from 180 Super League matches via expected possession value (EPV) models. The EPV-308 split the pitch into 308 5m x 5m zones, the EPV-77 split the pitch into 77 10m x 10m zones and the EPV-19 split the pitch in 19 zones of variable size dependent on the total zone value generated during a match. Attacking possessions were considered as Markov Chains, allowing the value of each zone visited to be estimated based on the outcome of the possession. The Kullback-Leibler Divergence was used to evaluate the reproducibility of the value generated from each zone (the reward distribution) by teams between matches. The EPV-308 had the greatest variability and lowest reproducibility, compared to EPV-77 and EPV-19. When six previous matches were considered, the team's subsequent match attacking performances had a similar reward distribution for EPV-19, EPV-77 and EPV-308 on 95 +/- 4%, 51 +/- 12% and 0 +/- 0% of occasions. This study supports the use of EPV-19 to evaluate team attacking performance in rugby league and provides a simple framework through which attacking performances can be compared between teams.
翻译:该研究旨在提供一个框架,用以评估球队在橄榄球联盟中攻击的表演情况,使用来自180个超级联盟比赛的59 233场比赛,通过预期拥有值(EPV)模型从180个超级联盟比赛中得出。EPV-308将球场分成308 5米x5米区域,EPV-77将球场分成77个10米x10米区域,EPV-19将球场分为19个视比赛期间产生的总区值大小而定的可变区,19个区,视比赛期间产生的总区值而定。进攻性能被视为Markov 链,允许根据拥有结果对所访问的每个区的价值进行估计。Kullback-Leiper 差异用来评价比赛之间每个区产生的价值(奖励分布)的再降幅。EPV-308与EPV-77和EPV-19相比,其最大的变异性和可再降率和最小的再降幅在19个区之间,在95+/4%、51+/-12%之间对E-19队进行性能评估,在0+-10%和1级小组之间对E-19进行业绩评估。