There has been recently a lot of progress in designing efficient partially synchronous BFT consensus protocols that are meant to serve as core consensus engines for Proof of Stake blockchain systems. While the state-of-the-art solutions attain virtually optimal performance under this theoretical model, there is still room for improvement, as several practical aspects of such systems are not captured by this model. Most notably, during regular execution, due to financial incentives in such systems, one expects an overwhelming fraction of nodes to honestly follow the protocol rules and only few of them to be faulty, most likely due to temporary network issues. Intuitively, the fact that almost all nodes behave honestly should result in stronger confidence in blocks finalized in such periods, however it is not the case under the classical model, where finality is binary. We propose Highway, a new consensus protocol that is safe and live in the classical partially synchronous BFT model, while at the same time offering practical improvements over existing solutions. Specifically, block finality in Highway is not binary but is expressed by fraction of nodes that would need to break the protocol rules in order for a block to be reverted. During periods of honest participation finality of blocks might reach well beyond 1/3 (as what would be the maximum for classical protocols), up to even 1 (complete certainty). Having finality defined this way, Highway offers flexibility with respect to the configuration of security thresholds among nodes running the protocol, allowing nodes with lower thresholds to reach finality faster than the ones requiring higher levels of confidence.
翻译:最近,在设计高效的、部分同步的BFT共识协议方面取得了很大进展,这些协议旨在成为证明链链系统的核心共识引擎。尽管在这一理论模式下,最先进的解决方案在理论模式下取得了几乎最佳的业绩,但仍有改进的余地,因为这一模式没有抓住这些系统的若干实际方面。在常规执行期间,由于这些系统的财政激励,人们期望绝大多数节点能够诚实地遵守协议规则,只有极少数节点有缺陷,最有可能是临时网络问题造成的。直觉而言之,几乎所有节点都表现得诚实,在这类时期最终确定的区块中,应当产生更坚定的信心,然而,在经典模式下情况并非如此,即最终是二进制。我们提出高速公路,一个新的共识协议是安全的,并生活在传统的部分同步的BFTFT模式中,同时提出实际改进现有解决方案。具体地说,阻碍高速公路最终完成不是二进制,而是通过一些节点表示,这需要打破协议规则,以便达到更高的结构,而最终的门槛则不会达到最高程度。在1/3号模式下,最终加入协议的阶段,可能确定最终承诺的阶段将达到最可靠程度。