The present research investigates the effectiveness of using a telepresence system compared to a video conferencing system and the effectiveness of using two cameras compared to one camera for remote physical therapy. We used Telegie as our telepresence system, which allowed users to see an environment captured with RGBD cameras in 3D through a VR headset. Since both telepresence and the inclusion of a second camera provide users with additional spatial information, we examined this affordance within the relevant context of remote physical therapy. Our dyadic study across different time zones paired 11 physical therapists with 76 participants who took on the role of patients for a remote session. Our quantitative questionnaire data and qualitative interviews with therapists revealed several important findings. First, after controlling for individual differences between participants, using two cameras had a marginally significant positive effect on physical therapy assessment scores from therapists. Second, the spatial ability of patients was a strong predictor of therapist assessment. And third, the video clarity of remote communication systems mattered. Based on our findings, we offer several suggestions and insights towards the future use of telepresence systems for remote communication.
翻译:目前的研究调查了与视像会议系统相比使用远程现场系统的有效性,以及使用与远程物理治疗一台相机相比使用两台相机的有效性。我们使用Telegie作为远程现场系统,使用户能够通过VR耳机看到3D用RGBD相机捕捉的环境。由于远程现场和纳入第二台相机都为用户提供了更多的空间信息,我们在远程物理治疗相关背景下研究了这种负担能力。我们在不同时区进行的三角研究将11名物理治疗师与76名参与者配对,他们承担了远程治疗病人的角色。我们量化的问卷数据和与治疗师的定性访谈揭示了若干重要结果。首先,在控制了参与者之间的个别差异之后,使用两台相机对治疗师的物理治疗评估得分产生了略微积极的影响。第二,病人的空间能力是治疗师评估的强有力预测器。第三,远程通信系统的视频清晰度非常重要。根据我们的研究结果,我们为今后远程通信系统的使用提供了若干建议和见解。</s>