Optimal treatment regimes are personalized policies for making a treatment decision based on subject characteristics, with the policy chosen to maximize some value. It is common to aim to maximize the mean outcome in the population, via a regime assigning treatment only to those whose mean outcome is higher under treatment versus control. However, the mean can be an unstable measure of centrality, resulting in imprecise statistical procedures, as well as unfair decisions that can be overly influenced by a small fraction of subjects. In this work, we propose a new median optimal treatment regime that instead treats individuals whose conditional median is higher under treatment. This ensures that optimal decisions for individuals from the same group are not overly influenced either by (i) a small fraction of the group (unlike the mean criterion), or (ii) unrelated subjects from different groups (unlike marginal median/quantile criteria). We introduce a new measure of value, the Average Conditional Median Effect (ACME), which summarizes across-group median treatment outcomes of a policy, and which the optimal median treatment regime maximizes. After developing key motivating examples that distinguish median optimal treatment regimes from mean and marginal median optimal treatment regimes, we give a nonparametric efficiency bound for estimating the ACME of a policy, and propose a new doubly robust-style estimator that achieves the efficiency bound under weak conditions. Finite-sample properties of the estimator are explored via numerical simulations and the proposed algorithm is illustrated using data from a randomized clinical trial in patients with HIV.
翻译:最佳治疗制度是按主题特点作出治疗决定的个性化政策,所选择的政策是尽量扩大某些价值; 通常的做法是,通过只将治疗平均结果在治疗与控制之下较高者之间分配的治疗制度,尽量扩大人口的平均结果; 然而,其平均值可能是一种不稳定的中心度衡量标准,导致统计程序不精确,以及不公平的决定,可能受到一小部分主题的过度影响; 在这项工作中,我们提议一种新的中位最佳治疗制度,而不是治疗条件条件中位数较高的治疗者; 这确保同一群体的个人的最佳决定不会受到以下因素的过度影响:(一) 群体中一小部分(与平均标准不同)或(二) 不同群体中位结果在治疗与控制之下较高者之间的不相干问题(与中位中位中位标准不同); 我们提出一个新的价值衡量标准,即平均条件中位效果效果(ACME),它总结出政策跨组的中位治疗结果,而最佳中位治疗制度最优化。