Explainability is motivated by the lack of transparency of black-box Machine Learning approaches, which do not foster trust and acceptance of Machine Learning algorithms. This also happens in the Predictive Process Monitoring field, where predictions, obtained by applying Machine Learning techniques, need to be explained to users, so as to gain their trust and acceptance. In this work, we carry on a user evaluation on explanation approaches for Predictive Process Monitoring aiming at investigating whether and how the explanations provided (i) are understandable; (ii) are useful in decision making tasks;(iii) can be further improved for process analysts, with different Machine Learning expertise levels. The results of the user evaluation show that, although explanation plots are overall understandable and useful for decision making tasks for Business Process Management users -- with and without experience in Machine Learning -- differences exist in the comprehension and usage of different plots, as well as in the way users with different Machine Learning expertise understand and use them.
翻译:解释的动机是黑箱机器学习方法缺乏透明度,这些方法无助于增进对机器学习算法的信任和接受,在预测过程监测领域也是如此,需要向用户解释通过应用机器学习技术获得的预测,以便获得他们的信任和接受。在这项工作中,我们对预测过程监测的解释方法进行了用户评价,目的是调查所提供的解释是否和如何可以理解:(一) 可理解;(二) 在决策任务中有用;(三) 可以进一步改进程序分析员,使其具有不同的机器学习专门知识水平。用户评价的结果表明,虽然解释图总体上可以理解,而且对于业务流程管理用户的决策任务有用 -- -- 不论是否具有机器学习的经验 -- -- 在理解和使用不同地块方面,以及在具有不同机器学习专门知识的用户理解和使用方式方面,存在着差异。