Whether, and under what conditions, groups exhibit "crowd wisdom" has been a major focus of research across the social and computational sciences. Much of this work has focused on the role of social influence in promoting the wisdom of the crowd versus leading the crowd astray, resulting in conflicting conclusions about how the social network structure determines the impact of social influence. Here, we demonstrate that it is not enough to consider the network structure in isolation. Using theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and reanalysis of four experimental datasets (totaling 2,885 human subjects), we find that the wisdom of crowds critically depends on the interaction between (i) the centralization of the social influence network and (ii) the distribution of the initial, individual estimates. By adopting a framework that integrates both the structure of the social influence and the distribution of the initial estimates, we bring previously conflicting results under one theoretical framework and clarify the effects of social influence on the wisdom of crowds.
翻译:在什么条件下,团体展示“拥挤的智慧”是否是社会科学和计算科学研究的一个主要焦点。许多这项工作侧重于社会影响在提高人群智慧和引导人群误入歧途方面的作用,导致社会网络结构如何决定社会影响影响的结论相互矛盾。在这里,我们证明孤立地考虑网络结构是不够的。我们利用理论分析、数字模拟和四个实验数据集(总共2 885个人类主体)的再分析,发现人群的智慧关键取决于(一) 社会影响网络集中化和(二) 初步个人估计的分布之间的相互作用。通过采用一个将社会影响结构和初步估计的分布结合起来的框架,我们在一个理论框架内提出以前相互冲突的结果,并澄清社会影响对人群智慧的影响。