Current science communication has a number of drawbacks and bottlenecks which have been subject of discussion lately: Among others, the rising number of published articles makes it nearly impossible to get a full overview of the state of the art in a certain field, or reproducibility is hampered by fixed-length, document-based publications which normally cannot cover all details of a research work. Recently, several initiatives have proposed knowledge graphs (KG) for organising scientific information as a solution to many of the current issues. The focus of these proposals is, however, usually restricted to very specific use cases. In this paper, we aim to transcend this limited perspective and present a comprehensive analysis of requirements for an Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) by (a) collecting and reviewing daily core tasks of a scientist, (b) establishing their consequential requirements for a KG-based system, (c) identifying overlaps and specificities, and their coverage in current solutions. As a result, we map necessary and desirable requirements for successful KG-based science communication, derive implications, and outline possible solutions.
翻译:最近讨论的当前科学交流有若干缺点和瓶颈:除其他外,发表的文章数量不断增加,使得几乎不可能全面了解某一领域的最新动态,或者由于固定长度的、以文件为基础的出版物通常无法涵盖研究工作的所有细节,妨碍了可复制性;最近,一些倡议提出了知识图,用以组织科学信息,作为解决许多当前问题的办法;然而,这些建议的重点通常限于非常具体的使用案例;在本文件中,我们力求超越这一有限的视角,全面分析开放研究知识图(ORKG)的要求,方法是:(a) 收集和审查科学家的日常核心任务;(b) 确定对基于KG的系统的相应要求;(c) 确定重叠和特性及其在当前解决方案中的涵盖范围;结果,我们为基于KG的成功科学交流提出必要和可取的要求,提出影响,并概述可能的解决办法。