Estimation of population size using incomplete lists (also called the capture-recapture problem) has a long history across many biological and social sciences. For example, human rights and other groups often construct partial and overlapping lists of victims of armed conflicts, with the hope of using this information to estimate the total number of victims. Earlier statistical methods for this setup either use potentially restrictive parametric assumptions, or else rely on typically suboptimal plug-in-type nonparametric estimators; however, both approaches can lead to substantial bias, the former via model misspecification and the latter via smoothing. Under an identifying assumption that two lists are conditionally independent given measured covariate information, we make several contributions. First, we derive the nonparametric efficiency bound for estimating the capture probability, which indicates the best possible performance of any estimator, and sheds light on the statistical limits of capture-recapture methods. Then we present a new estimator, and study its finite-sample properties, showing that it has a double robustness property new to capture-recapture, and that it is near-optimal in a non-asymptotic sense, under relatively mild nonparametric conditions. Next, we give a method for constructing confidence intervals for total population size from generic capture probability estimators, and prove non-asymptotic near-validity. Finally, we study our methods in simulations, and apply them to estimate the number of killings and disappearances attributable to different groups in Peru during its internal armed conflict between 1980 and 2000.
翻译:利用不完全的清单(也称为抓捕-抓捕问题)对人口规模进行估计,在许多生物和社会科学中都有很长的历史,例如,人权和其他群体往往建立部分和重叠的武装冲突受害者名单,希望利用这一信息估计受害者总数;这一设置的早期统计方法要么使用可能具有限制性的参数假设,要么依赖通常不尽人意的非参数性估计器;然而,两种方法都可能导致严重偏差,前者通过模型错误区分,后者通过平滑来研究。根据两个清单有条件地独立地适用经衡量的共变数据,我们作出若干贡献。首先,我们得出非对准的效率,以估计捕捉概率,这表明任何估计者的最佳可能表现,或者说明捕捉-抓回方法的统计限度。然后我们提出一个新的估计,研究其微缩性特性,表明它具有与捕捉有关的新特征的双重坚固性特征,而后者则通过平滑的模拟性估计,根据两种假设,我们作出一些确认性效率的假设是有条件的,在非精确性方法下,在不精确的准确性方法下,在不精确的精确度上,在不精确度上,在不精确的尺度上,我们进行我们进行。