Practitioners are poorly supported by the scientific literature when managing traceability information models (TIMs), which capture the structure and semantics of trace links. In practice, companies manage their TIMs in very different ways, even in cases where companies share many similarities. We present our findings from an in-depth focus group about TIM management with three different systems engineering companies. We find that the concrete needs of the companies as well as challenges such as scale and workflow integration are not considered by existing scientific work. We thus issue a call-to-arms for the requirements engineering and software and systems traceability communities, the two main communities for traceability research, to refocus their work on these practical problems.
翻译:在管理追踪信息模型时,从业者得不到科学文献的支持,科学文献记录了追踪链接的结构和语义,实际上,公司以非常不同的方式管理其TIM,即使公司有许多相似之处。我们向三个不同的系统工程公司介绍了关于TIM管理的深入重点小组的调查结果。我们发现,现有科学工作没有考虑到公司的具体需求以及规模和工作流程整合等挑战。因此,我们发出呼吁,要求工程、软件和系统追踪社区,即追踪研究的两个主要社区,重新将工作重点放在这些实际问题上。