Conventionally, random forests are built from "greedy" decision trees which each consider only one split at a time during their construction. The sub-optimality of greedy implementation has been well-known, yet mainstream adoption of more sophisticated tree building algorithms has been lacking. We examine under what circumstances an implementation of less greedy decision trees actually yields outperformance. To this end, a "stepwise lookahead" variation of the random forest algorithm is presented for its ability to better uncover binary feature interdependencies. In contrast to the greedy approach, the decision trees included in this random forest algorithm, each simultaneously consider three split nodes in tiers of depth two. It is demonstrated on synthetic data and financial price time series that the lookahead version significantly outperforms the greedy one when (a) certain non-linear relationships between feature-pairs are present and (b) if the signal-to-noise ratio is particularly low. A long-short trading strategy for copper futures is then backtested by training both greedy and stepwise lookahead random forests to predict the signs of daily price returns. The resulting superior performance of the lookahead algorithm is at least partially explained by the presence of "XOR-like" relationships between long-term and short-term technical indicators. More generally, across all examined datasets, when no such relationships between features are present, performance across random forests is similar. Given its enhanced ability to understand the feature-interdependencies present in complex systems, this lookahead variation is a useful extension to the toolkit of data scientists, in particular for financial machine learning, where conditions (a) and (b) are typically met.
翻译:在《公约》中,随机森林是从“贪婪”决策树中建立的,每个科学家在建设过程中每次只考虑一个分解。贪婪执行的次优性是众所周知的,但缺乏更精密的树木建筑算法。我们检查在何种情况下,较不贪婪决策树的实施实际上会产生超效。为此,随机森林算法的“逐步外观”变异是因为它能够更好地发现二进制特征的相互依存性。与贪婪的方法相反,这种随机森林算法中包含的决策树同时考虑深度2级的三个分解节点。在合成数据和金融价格时间序列中显示,当(a) 存在某些地貌与树皮之间的非线性关系时, 时, 随机森林算法的“ 渐渐变”, 然后通过训练贪婪和直观森林的随机性交易策略, 来预测日常价格回报的信号。 由此得出的直观性能比贪贪婪的模型, 通常以更优的性能来解释 。