Health-related rumors spreading online during a public crisis may pose a serious threat to people's well-being. Existing crisis informatics research lacks in-depth insights into the characteristics of health rumors and the efforts to debunk them on social media in a pandemic. To fill this gap, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of four months of rumor-related online discussion during COVID-19 on Weibo, a Chinese microblogging site. Results suggest that the dread (cause fear) type of health rumors provoked significantly more discussions and lasted longer than the wish (raise hope) type. We further explore how four kinds of social media users (i.e., government, media, organization, and individual) combat health rumors, and identify their preferred way of sharing debunking information and the key rhetoric strategies used in the process. We examine the relationship between debunking and rumor discussions using a Granger causality approach, and show the efficacy of debunking in suppressing rumor discussions, which is time-sensitive and varies across rumor types and debunkers. Our results can provide insights into crisis informatics and risk management on social media in pandemic settings.
翻译:在公共危机期间,与健康有关的流言在网上传播,可能对人民的福祉构成严重威胁。现有的危机信息学研究缺乏对健康流言特征的深入了解,也没有努力在社交媒体上披露这些流言的特征。为了填补这一空白,我们全面分析了中国微博网站Weibo 的COVID-19 期间四个月与流言有关的在线讨论。结果显示,恐惧(因为恐惧)类型的健康流言引起了比希望(提高希望)类型的讨论和持续时间长得多得多。我们进一步探讨四种社会媒体用户(即政府、媒体、组织和个人)如何打击健康流言,并找出他们分享披露信息以及在此过程中使用的关键言辞战略的首选方式。我们用一个愤怒的因果关系方法,审视披露和流言论讨论之间的关系,并展示抑制流言讨论的功效,这种讨论对时间敏感,而且不同流言类型和拆信者不同。我们的结果可以提供对大流行病环境中社会媒体的危机信息和风险管理的洞察力。