The emergence of online political advertising has come with little regulation, allowing political advertisers on social media to avoid accountability. We analyze how transparency deficits caused by dark money and group impermanence relate to the sentiment of political ads on Facebook. We obtained 525,796 ads with FEC-registered advertisers from Facebook's ad library that ran between August-November 2018. We compare ads run by candidates, parties, and outside groups, which we classify by (i) their donor transparency (dark money or disclosed) and (ii) the group's permanence (disappearing after 2018 or re-registering). Ads run by dark money and disappearing outside groups were more negative than transparent and re-registering groups, respectively. Outside groups as a whole also ran more negative ads than candidates and parties. These results suggest that transparency for political speech is associated with advertising tone: the most negative advertising comes from organizations with less donor disclosure and permanence.
翻译:在线政治广告的出现没有多少监管,允许社交媒体上的政治广告商避免问责。我们分析了黑钱和团体无常性造成的透明度赤字如何与Facebook上的政治广告情绪相关。我们从2018年8月至11月期间的Facebook广告图书馆获得525 796个与FEC注册广告商的广告。我们比较了候选人、政党和外部团体的广告,我们将其分类为:(一) 其捐助方透明度(黑钱或披露)和(二) 该团体的持久性(2018年后消失或重新登记 ) 。 黑钱和团体无常性引发的广告分别比透明和重新注册团体更具有负面性。 外部团体总体上也比候选人和政党的负面广告要多。 这些结果表明,政治演讲的透明度与广告的语调有关:最负面的广告来自捐助方披露和永久性较少的组织。