Educational technologies, and the systems of schooling in which they are deployed, enact particular ideologies about what is important to know and how learners should learn. As artificial intelligence technologies -- in education and beyond -- have led to inequitable outcomes for marginalized communities, various approaches have been developed to evaluate and mitigate AI systems' disparate impact. However, we argue in this paper that the dominant paradigm of evaluating fairness on the basis of performance disparities in AI models is inadequate for confronting the structural inequities that educational AI systems (re)produce. We draw on a lens of structural injustice informed by critical theory and Black feminist scholarship to critically interrogate several widely-studied and widely-adopted categories of educational AI systems and demonstrate how educational AI technologies are bound up in and reproduce historical legacies of structural injustice and inequity, regardless of the parity of their models' performance. We close with alternative visions for a more equitable future for educational AI research.
翻译:教育技术及其应用的教学系统,对知识的重要性和学习者应当如何学习的问题产生了特殊的意识形态。由于人为智能技术 -- -- 教育领域和范围以外 -- -- 已经导致边缘化社区不平等的结果,已经制定了各种方法来评估和减轻AI系统的不同影响。然而,我们在本文中争辩说,基于AI模型绩效差异评价公平性的主要模式不足以应对教育AI系统(再生)产生的结构性不平等。我们从批判理论和黑人女权主义奖学金中吸取结构性不公正的视角,批判性地询问几类广泛研究和被广泛接受的教育AI系统,并展示教育AI技术如何与结构性不公正和不平等的历史遗产联系在一起并复制,而不论其模式绩效的均等性能如何。我们最后提出了为教育AI研究创造更公平未来的其他愿景。