In epidemiology research with cancer registry data, it is often of primary interest to make inference on cancer death, not overall survival. Since cause of death is not easy to collect or is not necessarily reliable in cancer registries, some special methodologies have been introduced and widely used by using the concepts of the relative survival ratio and the net survival. In making inference of those measures, external life tables of the general population are utilized to adjust the impact of non-cancer death on overall survival. The validity of this adjustment relies on the assumption that mortality in the external life table approximates non-cancer mortality of cancer patients. However, the population used to calculate a life table may include cancer death and cancer patients. Sensitivity analysis proposed by Talb\"{a}ck and Dickman to address it requires additional information which is often not easily available. We propose a method to make inference on the net survival accounting for potential presence of cancer patients and cancer death in the life table for the general population. The idea of adjustment is to consider correspondence of cancer mortality in the life table and that in the cancer registry. We realize a novel method to adjust cancer mortality in the cancer registry without any additional information to the standard analyses of cancer registries. Our simulation study revealed that the proposed method successfully removed the bias. We illustrate the proposed method with the cancer registry data in England.
翻译:在癌症登记数据的流行病学研究中,通常最感兴趣的是进行癌症死亡率的推断,而不是总生存期。由于死亡原因不易收集或不一定可靠,因此引入了一些特殊的方法学,利用相对生存率和净生存率的概念广泛使用。在进行这些度量的推断时,使用外部整体人口生命表来调整非癌死亡对总生存期的影响。这种调整的有效性依赖于一个假设:外部生命表中的死亡率近似于癌症患者的非癌症死亡率。然而,用于计算人口寿命表的人群可能包括癌症死亡和癌症患者。 Talb\"{a}ck和Dickman提出的敏感性分析来解决这个问题需要额外的信息,这通常不容易获得。我们提出了一种方法来推断净生存率,考虑到人口寿命表中可能存在癌症患者和癌症死亡的情况。调整的想法是考虑寿命表中的癌症死亡率和癌症登记数据中的癌症死亡率的对应关系。我们实现了一种新的方法,在不需要任何额外信息的情况下,调整了癌症登记中的癌症死亡率。我们的模拟研究表明,所提出的方法成功消除了偏差。我们用英格兰的癌症登记数据说明了所提出的方法。