Working with SEM and crosssectional data, and depending on the studied phenomenon, assuming an acyclic model may mean that we obtain only a partial view of the mechanisms that explain causal relationships between a set of theoretical constructs, treated as antecedents and consequences. Our twogiven that variables are step approach allows researchers to identify and measure cyclic effects when working with cross algorithm. Using the resources and appropriation tsectional data and a PLS modelling heory and the sequential model of internet appropriation, w e demonstrate the importance of considering cyclic effects. Our results show that opportunities for physical access followed by digital skills acquisition enhance internet usage (acyclic effects), but also that internet usage intensity, in reverse, reinforces both digital skills and physical access (cyclic effects), supporting Norris (2001) social stratification hypothesis regarding future evolution of the digital divide.
翻译:与SEM和跨部门数据合作,并视所研究的现象而定,假设一个周期模型可能意味着我们只对解释一套理论结构之间因果关系的机制获得部分看法,这些理论结构被视为先行和后果。我们的两个因素是,变量是分步法,使研究人员在使用交叉算法时能够识别和测量周期效应。利用资源和拨款的截断数据和PLS建模温度以及互联网拨款的顺序模型模型模式,w e 证明了考虑周期效应的重要性。我们的结果表明,实际接入的机会加上数字技能的获取会增强互联网的使用(周期效应),而互联网的使用强度反过来又强化了数字技能和实际接入(周期效应),支持Norris(2001年)关于数字鸿沟未来演变的社会分化假设。