Objective: Distorted loudness perception is one of the main complaints of hearing aid users. Being able to measure loudness perception correctly in the clinic is essential for fitting hearing aids. For this, experiments in the clinic should be able to reflect and capture loudness perception as in everyday-life situations. Little research has been done comparing loudness perception in the field and in the laboratory. Design: Participants rated the loudness in the field and in the laboratory of 36 driving actions done by four different vehicles. The field measurements were done in a restricted street and recorded with a 360deg camera and a tetrahedral microphone. The recorded stimuli, which are openly accessible, were presented in three different conditions in the laboratory: 360deg video recordings with a head-mounted display, video recordings with a desktop monitor, and audio-only. Sample: Thirteen normal-hearing participants and 18 hearing-impaired participants participated in the study. Results: The driving actions were rated significantly louder in the laboratory than in the field for the audio-only condition. These loudness rating differences were bigger for louder sounds in two laboratory conditions, i.e., the higher the sound level of a driving action was the more likely it was to be rated louder in the laboratory. There were no significant differences in the loudness ratings between the three laboratory conditions and between groups. Conclusions: The results of this experiment further remark the importance of increasing the realism and immersion when measuring loudness in the clinic.
翻译:目标: 听力援助使用者的主要抱怨之一是声响感听觉; 能够正确测量诊所的声响感知,是安装助听器的关键。 为此, 诊所的实验应该能够反映和捕捉日常生活中的声响感知; 没有做什么研究比较现场和实验室中的声响感知; 设计: 参与者对现场和实验室中由四部不同车辆完成的36次驾驶动作的响度进行评分。 现场测量是在限制的街道上进行的, 并用360deg相机和四面式麦克风记录。 记录到的震动感知感知度差异在诊所里是公开的, 在三个不同的条件下展示: 360deg录制的录相带显示和捕捉到日常生活中的声响感知觉感; 抽样: 13个正常听觉的参与者和18个听力障碍的参与者参加了这项研究。 结果: 驱动动作在实验室中被评为声响程度大大高于现场, 声响评分差异在两个实验室条件下更大, 也就是说, 更高的实验室的声觉评为更深层次的评为: 更深层次的评为: 实验室的评为更深的评为: 实验室的评为更深的评为更深的评为: 。