About forty years ago, in a now--seminal contribution, Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) introduced a critical characterization of the propensity score as a central quantity for drawing causal inferences in observational study settings. In the decades since, much progress has been made across several research fronts in causal inference, notably including the re-weighting and matching paradigms. Focusing on the former and specifically on its intersection with machine learning and semiparametric efficiency theory, we re-examine the role of the propensity score in modern methodological developments. As Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)'s contribution spurred a focus on the balancing property of the propensity score, we re-examine the degree to which and how this property plays a role in the development of asymptotically efficient estimators of causal effects; moreover, we discuss a connection between the balancing property and efficient estimation in the form of score equations and propose a score test for evaluating whether an estimator achieves balance.
翻译:大约40年前,罗森鲍姆 & 鲁宾(1983年)在一项现在的流行病学贡献中,对倾向性评分作为在观察研究环境中得出因果推理的中央量进行了批判性定性,自那以后的几十年中,在因果推理的几个研究领域取得了很大进展,特别是重估和匹配范式。我们侧重于前者,特别是其与机器学习和半对称效率理论的交叉点,重新审查了倾向性评分在现代方法发展中的作用。正如罗森鲍姆 & 鲁宾(1983年)的贡献促使人们注重平衡偏向性评分的属性一样,我们重新审视了该属性在发展因果效应的零位高效估测算器中作用的程度和作用;此外,我们讨论了以计分方程形式平衡财产与有效估测算之间的联系,并提出了评估估算者是否实现平衡的得分测试。