With the increasing importance of data and artificial intelligence, organizations strive to become more data-driven. However, current data architectures are not necessarily designed to keep up with the scale and scope of data and analytics use cases. In fact, existing architectures often fail to deliver the promised value associated with them. Data mesh is a socio-technical concept that includes architectural aspects to promote data democratization and enables organizations to become truly data-driven. As the concept of data mesh is still novel, it lacks empirical insights from the field. Specifically, an understanding of the motivational factors for introducing data mesh, the associated challenges, best practices, its business impact, and potential archetypes, is missing. To address this gap, we conduct 15 semi-structured interviews with industry experts. Our results show, among other insights, that industry experts have difficulties with the transition toward federated governance associated with the data mesh concept, the shift of responsibility for the development, provision, and maintenance of data products, and the concept of a data product model. In our work, we derive multiple best practices and suggest organizations embrace elements of data fabric, observe the data product usage, create quick wins in the early phases, and favor small dedicated teams that prioritize data products. While we acknowledge that organizations need to apply best practices according to their individual needs, we also deduct two archetypes that provide suggestions in more detail. Our findings synthesize insights from industry experts and provide researchers and professionals with guidelines for the successful adoption of data mesh.
翻译:随着数据和人工智能的日益重要性,各组织努力成为更多的数据驱动者。然而,目前的数据结构并不一定是为了跟上数据的规模和范围而设计,分析也使用案例。事实上,现有的结构往往不能提供与之相承诺的价值。数据网是一个社会技术概念,包括建筑方面,以促进数据民主化,使各组织能够真正成为数据驱动者。由于数据网目的概念仍然很新颖,它缺乏实地的经验见解。具体而言,缺乏对引入数据网目、相关挑战、最佳做法、其商业影响和潜在古型的动力因素的理解。为弥补这一差距,我们与行业专家进行了15次半结构性访谈。我们的结果除其他见解外,还表明行业专家在向与数据网网概念相关的联合治理过渡、数据产品开发、提供和维护的责任转移以及数据产品综合模型的概念方面遇到困难。在我们的工作中,我们发现多种最佳做法,并建议组织接受数据结构要素,观察数据产品使用情况,观察数据产品使用情况,在早期,我们快速地选择了数据类型,我们更需要先入为先入为主的行业,我们先入为先入为先入为先入为先入。