Informed importance tempering (IIT) is an easy-to-implement MCMC algorithm that can be seen as an extension of the familiar Metropolis-Hastings algorithm with the special feature that informed proposals are always accepted, and which was shown in Zhou and Smith (2022) to converge much more quickly in some common circumstances. This work develops a new, comprehensive guide to the use of IIT in many situations. First, we propose two IIT schemes that run faster than existing informed MCMC methods on discrete spaces by not requiring the posterior evaluation of all neighboring states. Second, we integrate IIT with other MCMC techniques, including simulated tempering, pseudo-marginal and multiple-try methods (on general state spaces), which have been conventionally implemented as Metropolis-Hastings schemes and can suffer from low acceptance rates. The use of IIT allows us to always accept proposals and brings about new opportunities for optimizing the sampler which are not possible under the Metropolis-Hastings framework. Numerical examples illustrating our findings are provided for each proposed algorithm, and a general theory on the complexity of IIT methods is developed.
翻译:知情的重要性调节(IIT)是一种易于实现的MCMC算法,可以看作是熟悉的Metropolis-Hastings算法的扩展特性,在Zhou和Smith(2022)中已经证明在某些常见情况下收敛速度更快。本工作开发了一份新的、全面的IIT使用指南,首先,我们提出了两种IIT方案,通过不需要对所有相邻状态进行后验评估,就比现有的离散空间中已知的MCMC方法更快地运行。其次,我们将IIT与其他MCMC技术集成,包括模拟退火、伪边缘和多次尝试方法(在一般状态空间上),这些方法通常作为Metropolis-Hastings方案实现,并可能面临低接受率的问题。使用IIT,我们可以始终接受提案,并带来新的优化采样器的机会,在Metropolis-Hastings框架下不可能实现。为每个提议的算法提供了数值示例,并开发了关于IIT方法复杂度的一般理论。