Causal background knowledge about the existence or the absence of causal edges and paths is frequently encountered in observational studies. The shared directed edges and links of a subclass of Markov equivalent DAGs refined due to background knowledge can be represented by a causal maximally partially directed acyclic graph (MPDAG). In this paper, we first provide a sound and complete graphical characterization of causal MPDAGs and give a minimal representation of a causal MPDAG. Then, we introduce a novel representation called direct causal clause (DCC) to represent all types of causal background knowledge in a unified form. Using DCCs, we study the consistency and equivalency of causal background knowledge and show that any causal background knowledge set can be equivalently decomposed into a causal MPDAG plus a minimal residual set of DCCs. Polynomial-time algorithms are also provided for checking the consistency, equivalency, and finding the decomposed MPDAG and residual DCCs. Finally, with causal background knowledge, we prove a sufficient and necessary condition to identify causal effects and surprisingly find that the identifiability of causal effects only depends on the decomposed MPDAG. We also develop a local IDA-type algorithm to estimate the possible values of an unidentifiable effect. Simulations suggest that causal background knowledge can significantly improve the identifiability of causal effects.
翻译:在观察研究中,经常会遇到关于因果边缘和路径的存在或不存在的因果关系背景知识。根据背景知识完善的Markov等效DAG子类的共同直接边缘和联系,可以用因果性最大部分定向循环图(MPDAG)来表示。在本文中,我们首先对因果性MPDAG进行完整和完整的图形化描述,并尽可能少地表示因果性MPDAG。然后,我们引入一个被称为直接因果条款(DCC)的新表述,以统一的形式代表所有类型的因果背景知识。我们利用DCC,研究因果背景知识的一致性和同等性,并表明任何因果背景知识组合可以等同地分解成因果性MPDAG加上最低限度的残缺数据集。我们提供聚合时间算法,以检查因果性、等值和找到不相容性MPDAG和残存的DCC。最后,我们证明一个充分和必要的条件,以确定因果性背景知识的连贯性和等同性,并令人惊讶地发现,任何因果性背景知识的因果性背景知识组合性都可能使IMDA的因性分析结果性评估结果性分析结果性分析结果分析结果分析结果性分析结果性分析结果性分析结果,我们只能性评估只能性评估只能性评估。