It is common for people to engage in information acquisition tasks while on the move. To understand how users' visual behaviors influence microlearning, a form of mobile information acquisition, we conducted a shadowing study with 8 participants and identified three common visual behaviors: 'glance', 'inspect', and 'drift'. We found that 'drift' best supports mobile information acquisition. We also identified four user-related factors that can influence the utilization of mobile information acquisition opportunities: situational awareness, switching costs, ongoing cognitive processes, and awareness of opportunities. We further examined how these user-related factors interplay with device-related factors through a technology probe with 20 participants using mobile phones and optical head-mounted displays (OHMDs). Results indicate that different device platforms significantly influence how mobile information acquisition opportunities are used: OHMDs can better support mobile information acquisition when visual attention is fragmented. OHMDs facilitate shorter visual switch-times between the task and surroundings, which reduces the mental barrier of task transition. Mobile phones, on the other hand, provide a more focused experience in more stable surroundings. Based on these findings, we discuss trade-offs and design implications for supporting information acquisition tasks on the move.
翻译:为了了解用户的视觉行为如何影响微学习,即一种移动信息获取的形式,我们与8名参与者进行了影子研究,并确定了三种常见的视觉行为:“Glance”、“Inspect”和“drft”。我们发现,“drft”最有利于移动信息获取。我们还确定了四个影响移动信息获取机会的利用的与用户相关的因素:情景意识、转换成本、持续认知过程和机会意识。我们进一步研究了这些与用户有关的因素如何与设备相关因素相互作用。我们通过一个技术探测,与20名参与者使用移动电话和光学头挂图(OHMDs)进行了一项技术探测。结果显示,不同的设备平台对移动信息获取机会的使用产生了重大影响:OHMD在视觉注意力分散时能够更好地支持移动信息获取。OHMDs为任务和周围之间缩短视觉切换时间提供了便利,从而降低了任务转变的心理障碍。在另一方面,移动电话则提供了在更稳定的周围更集中的经验。基于这些发现,我们讨论交易和设计对获取信息的影响。