Knowing the true effect size of clinical interventions in randomised clinical trials is key to informing the public health policies. Vaccine efficacy is defined in terms of the ratio of two risks, however only approximate methods are available for the variance of the 'risk ratio'. In this article, we show using a probabilistic model that uncertainty in the efficacy rate could be underestimated when the disease risk is low. Factoring in the baseline rate of the disease we estimate broader confidence intervals for the efficacy rates of the vaccines recently developed for COVID-19. We propose a new method for calculating the sample size in case-control studies where the efficacy is of interest. We further discuss the deleterious effects of classification bias which is particularly relevant at low disease prevalence.
翻译:了解随机临床试验临床干预的真正影响规模是向公共卫生政策提供信息的关键。疫苗效力是根据两种风险的比率界定的,但只有对“风险比率”差异的近似方法。在本篇文章中,我们用一种概率模型表明,当疾病风险低时,效率的不确定性可能被低估。在计算疾病的基线率时,我们估计对最近为COVID-19开发的疫苗的功效率有更广泛的信任间隔。我们提出了一种新的方法,用于计算病例控制研究的抽样规模,如果效果值得注意。我们进一步讨论分类偏差的有害影响,这种影响对低疾病流行率特别相关。