Background: Nowadays, regulatory requirements engineering (regulatory RE) faces challenges of interdisciplinary nature that cannot be tackled due to existing research gaps. Aims: We envision an approach to solve some of the challenges related to the nature and complexity of regulatory requirements, the necessity for domain knowledge, and the involvement of legal experts in regulatory RE. Method: We suggest the qualitative analysis of regulatory texts combined with the further case study to develop an empirical foundation for our research. Results: We outline our vision for the application of extended artefact-based modeling for regulatory RE. Conclusions: Empirical methodology is an essential instrument to address interdisciplinarity and complexity in regulatory RE. Artefact-based modeling supported by empirical results can solve a particular set of problems while not limiting the application of other methods and tools and facilitating the interaction between different fields of practice and research.
翻译:目标:我们设想了一种办法,解决与监管要求的性质和复杂性、对域知识的必要性以及法律专家参与监管可再生能源的必要性有关的一些挑战。 方法:我们建议对监管文本进行定性分析,同时进一步进行案例研究,以便为我们的研究奠定一个经验基础。 成果:我们概述了我们关于为监管可再生能源应用扩展的以艺术为基础的模型的设想。结论:经验方法是解决监管RE中差异性和复杂性的基本工具。以经验结果为基础的基于艺术的建模可以解决一系列特定问题,同时不限制其他方法和工具的应用,促进不同实践和研究领域之间的互动。