Extended Bounded Response LTL with Past (LTLEBR+P) is a safety fragment of Linear Temporal Logic with Past (LTL+P) that has been recently introduced in the context of reactive synthesis. The strength of LTLEBR+P is a fully symbolic compilation of formulas into symbolic deterministic automata. Its syntax is organized in four levels. The first three levels feature (a particular combination of) future temporal modalities, the last one admits only past temporal operators. At the base of such a structuring there are algorithmic motivations: each level corresponds to a step of the algorithm for the automaton construction. The complex syntax of LTLEBR+P made it difficult to precisely characterize its expressive power, and to compare it with other LTL+P safety fragments. In this paper, we first prove that LTLEBR+P is expressively complete with respect to the safety fragment of LTL+P, that is, any safety language definable in LTL+P can be formalized in LTLEBR+P, and vice versa. From this, it follows that LTLEBR+P and Safety-LTL are expressively equivalent. Then, we show that past modalities play an essential role in LTLEBR+P: we prove that the future fragment of LTLEBR+P is strictly less expressive than full LTLEBR+P.
翻译:与过去( LTLEBR+P ) 的扩展反应LTLL( 超音频) 是过去( LTLEBR+P ) 线性时间逻辑( LTL+P ) 的安全片段, 最近在反应合成中引入了它。 LTLEBR+P 的强度是将公式完全象征性地编集成象征性的确定性自动成单体。 它的语法分为四级。 头三个等级的特征( 特别组合) 未来时间模式, 上一个等级只承认过去的时间操作员。 在这样一个结构的基点里, 有算法动机: 每级都对应汽车制造的算法的一步。 LTLEBR+P 的复杂语法使得很难精确地描述其表达力, 并与其他 LTLE+P 安全片段进行比较。 在本文中, LTLE+P 的任何安全语言都可以在LE+ 直观的公式中正式化成正统化 。 从这个角度, 显示我们过去和未来的BLE+LF 的完整的比 。