In this paper, we derive an algorithmic fairness metric for the recommendation algorithms that power LinkedIn from the fairness notion of equal opportunity for equally qualified candidates. We borrow from the economic literature on discrimination to arrive at a test for detecting algorithmic discrimination, which we then use to audit two algorithms from LinkedIn with respect to gender bias. Moreover, we introduce a framework for distinguishing algorithmic bias from human bias, both of which can potentially exist on a two-sided platform.
翻译:在本文中,我们从同等资格候选人机会平等的公平概念中,为“LinkedIn”的建议算法提供了一种算法公平性衡量标准。我们借用了有关歧视的经济文献,以得出一个检测算法歧视的测试,然后我们用它来审计“LinkedIn”在性别偏见方面的两种算法。此外,我们引入了一个框架来区分算法偏见和人类偏见,两者都有可能存在于一个双面的平台上。